Online Journalism 101- Post #3: What constitutes a credible source?
A source without credibility is like a gun without bullets. An
unloaded gun is enough to petrify people but it doesn't have the ability to
kill; A source without credibility are able to distribute information but it
will not be reliable and trusted by active audiences.
Credibility of a source is made
up of verification and independence of the author, currency and relevancy, and
the aim of the author for producing the piece of information.
Verification is a process of collecting evidence that confirms the
accuracy of something. In this process, the author should be identified in
order to be held accountable of its product. If the product is of scholarly
information, it shall then has evidence to what it says, peer-reviewed,
contains bibliography and published by an established publisher. Transparency
is also important to show that the author is unbiased and fair while producing
the information.
Currency relates to the date of information being published. When
was the information being published? Outdated information may not be relevant
to attend current issue.
Aim of the author is also vital to deem the piece of information as
credible. Does the author write to inform, express, persuade or condemn? The
reader must be aware of the writing style of the author whether it is balanced
or slandering.
Redundancy, grammatical, spelling and syntax errors are small
little things but it also constitute the credibility of a source too!
Sources
1. USQ Module 2, JRN1010 News Literacy 2016
2. https://www.college.columbia.edu/academics/integrity-sourcecredibility
3. http://library.ucsc.edu/help/research/evaluate-the-quality-and-credibility-of-your-sources
Sources
1. USQ Module 2, JRN1010 News Literacy 2016
2. https://www.college.columbia.edu/academics/integrity-sourcecredibility
3. http://library.ucsc.edu/help/research/evaluate-the-quality-and-credibility-of-your-sources
Comments
Post a Comment